Imi calc cuvantul. Nu e o poveste. E un comentariu ce l'am pus pe profilul cuiva pe youtube.

Urmatorul articol , a fost scris de Beny ,fiind un comentariu publicat pe profilul de youtube al userului "QualiaSoup" .Blogul lui Beny il puteti gasi la adresa aceasta Smiling Jester.Si pentru a-l citi , aveti nevoie de cunoasterea limbii engleze.Lecturare placuta.


First of all, as a declared Christian I want to apologize for some christians who lack abstractization capabilities (I don't know if it's the perfect therm, I'm barely 18 years old, and english is not my native tongue).
I love science and I think that disregarding science is the worst thing the Church has ever done. (They are all God's laws, shouldn't they study them for that?)
I don't want to get into conversations, because, as experience told me, we well need more than messages for that, and they are endless.
I respect all your videos, and even though (i think) i understood exactly what they meant, i'm still an Christian because i still have my doubts.
To point my doubts, i will make the following statements:


1: All your videos explain a part of evolution theory that I call "genetical adaptability", which, is stupid of us to disregard it as a fact. The thing that puzzles me, is the beginning. I once saw a documentary where somebody reproduced in the laboratory the primordial atmosphere, and after a period of time, new traces of amino-acids were found. As we know, amino-acids are the "chain- links" of proteins, so we can assume that proteins are OBTAINABLE in that atmosphere. From proteins to any basic life form is, in my opinion an incredibly big "hop". So, my statement is
"The most basic life form IS an irreducible complex." I also want to add the followings:
-The genetical adaptability is an SCIENTIFIC UNDENIABLE FACT, so it's useless to argue about that, and if christians don't accept that that means the problem is elsewhere, not in the theory itself.
-Life appearing through evolving of matter itself, is (in my opinion) an PLAUSIBLE thing, not A FACT. Same as the Big Bang Theory


2. Maybe, 90% of the christians would accuse me of heresy, but i think that the whole existence of God is also PLAUSIBLE. (I see God as a being from an superior dimension, aware of any detail in our dimension, and capable of transferring energy from one dimension to another. Hopefully i will be able to explain my PERCEPTION in detail, but not now.)
My second statement is "As the evolutive capabilities of living matter are an scientific fact, the true conflict theist-atheist is between 'God created the matter which composes our universe (My opinion, transferred it from anywhere else)', and 'Matter derived from an highly condensed point, which expanded, formed the structure of the universe, and then the matter evolved into life'"

This statement implies that we DO require faith to believe in either one of those theories, so we actually must CHOSE which to believe. This choice is influenced by our personal BIAS. (and so, we do have the free choice God promises to give us). I personally chose to believe in the matter being transferred in our universe, than evolving itself. I find God more PLAUSIBLE.

I would appreciate a lot an answer concerning this subject.
Congratulations with the videos. I find them very straight to the point, and i would love to be able to make videos like that, to express myself more accurately (only text communication is extremely deficient).

Regards!